Did he really think it was a nice hat.Here is a trivial case of hypocrisy, assuming it really was hypocrisy.
Today, a US Congressman complimented me on my hat. If he didn't mean it, it was just a trivial case, like asking "how are you?". when you don't actually want to know.
here is the entry from the Weiss Chronicle BlogThursday, December 06, 2007
"Nice Hat." said the CongressmanToday I was briefing a Congressman on something. In the introductory smalltalk I noted that I had never been in an office with a stuffed warthog (he had not just a stuffed warthog but a stuffed bear, a stuffed lion and about 6 stuffed deer, ibex, etc. After my brief I was putting on my coat and hat (which were needed because today was really, really cold with snow on the ground) and the Congressman said, "Nice Hat" (I was wearing the one that is felt and you can fold and bend it).
So on the way home I noted to the people that I was with that this was the first time I ever got a compliment from a Congressman about my hat.
"and you think its sincere?" asked one of the people.
I responded that I had a hard time believing a US Congressman thinks its worthwhile to use insincere compliments to win a favor from a mid level bureaucrat.
Was Maimonides a Hypocrite (in the "Letter to Yemen")
I take a class on Monday evenings. This evening we were studying the Letter (a.k.a., Epistle) to Yemen. It addresses the same overarching problem as one Maimonides wrote earlier which has come to be called the "Letter on Martyrdom". In the Martyrdom letter, the Jews of N. Africa were being oppressed and forced to convert to Islam by a Sunni sect. In the Yemen letter, the Jews of Yemen were being oppressed and forced to covert to Islam by a Shiite sect. In the former case, Maimonides address the issue of whether martyrdom is required religiously. In the latter case, he addresses the religious and theological significance of the oppression.
In the Yemen letter he states at one point that the oppression yields the benefit of removing from Judaism, those who are either not pious or not pure descendants of the revelation at Sinai. This sounds unkind, (even a bit like a Lord Vodermort speech), to our modern sensibility.
I guess that most of the class and maybe most people who've read this believe that Maimonides was making a pastoral (or polemic) point and didn't really believe it. The goal would have been to comfort the people in Yemen.
If so, this is hypocrisy. However, it is the good kind.